Review



cd163  (Miltenyi Biotec)


Bioz Verified Symbol Miltenyi Biotec is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Miltenyi Biotec manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 94

    Structured Review

    Miltenyi Biotec cd163
    Cd163, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 47 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/cd163/product/Miltenyi Biotec
    Average 94 stars, based on 47 article reviews
    cd163 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    94/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    95
    Thermo Fisher gene exp cd163 rn01492519 m1
    Gene Exp Cd163 Rn01492519 M1, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/gene exp cd163 rn01492519 m1/product/Thermo Fisher
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    gene exp cd163 rn01492519 m1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    cd163  (Bioss)
    94
    Bioss cd163
    Cd163, supplied by Bioss, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/cd163/product/Bioss
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    cd163 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Proteintech mouse anti cd68 plus rabbit anti cd163
    Mouse Anti Cd68 Plus Rabbit Anti Cd163, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse anti cd68 plus rabbit anti cd163/product/Proteintech
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse anti cd68 plus rabbit anti cd163 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Proteintech cd163 polyclonal antibody
    Evaluation of immune inflammation (RAW264.7) in the scaffolds. A, B) Immunofluorescent staining results and quantitative fluorescence intensity of CD206 in RAW264.7 cells co-cultured with different sample extracts, with CD206 (M2 marker) shown in red (scale bar = 50 μm). C, D) Immunofluorescent staining results and quantitative fluorescence intensity of CD86 in RAW264.7 cells co-cultured with different sample extracts, with CD86 (M1 marker) shown in green (scale bar = 50 μm). E, F) Immunofluorescent staining results and quantitative fluorescence intensity of <t>CD163</t> in RAW264.7 cells co-cultured with different sample extracts, with CD163 (M2 marker) shown in green (scale bar = 50 μm). G) Flow cytometry analysis of CD86 and CD11b positive cells in inflammatory RAW264.7 cells. H) Fluorescence enzyme labeling for the quantitative analysis of ROS content in macrophages. I) Cell viability of RAW264.7 cells co-cultured with different sample extracts for 1, 3, and 5 days. J) NO content in RAW264.7 cells co-cultured with different sample extracts. K) DCFH-DA fluorescent probe detection to evaluate ROS content in macrophages after stimulation with different sample extracts (scale bar = 100 μm). P values were determined using one-way ANOVA (∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001, ∗∗∗P < 0.001, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗P < 0.05, N.S., not significant).
    Cd163 Polyclonal Antibody, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/cd163 polyclonal antibody/product/Proteintech
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    cd163 polyclonal antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    88
    Thermo Fisher gene exp cd163 mm00474091 m1
    Evaluation of immune inflammation (RAW264.7) in the scaffolds. A, B) Immunofluorescent staining results and quantitative fluorescence intensity of CD206 in RAW264.7 cells co-cultured with different sample extracts, with CD206 (M2 marker) shown in red (scale bar = 50 μm). C, D) Immunofluorescent staining results and quantitative fluorescence intensity of CD86 in RAW264.7 cells co-cultured with different sample extracts, with CD86 (M1 marker) shown in green (scale bar = 50 μm). E, F) Immunofluorescent staining results and quantitative fluorescence intensity of <t>CD163</t> in RAW264.7 cells co-cultured with different sample extracts, with CD163 (M2 marker) shown in green (scale bar = 50 μm). G) Flow cytometry analysis of CD86 and CD11b positive cells in inflammatory RAW264.7 cells. H) Fluorescence enzyme labeling for the quantitative analysis of ROS content in macrophages. I) Cell viability of RAW264.7 cells co-cultured with different sample extracts for 1, 3, and 5 days. J) NO content in RAW264.7 cells co-cultured with different sample extracts. K) DCFH-DA fluorescent probe detection to evaluate ROS content in macrophages after stimulation with different sample extracts (scale bar = 100 μm). P values were determined using one-way ANOVA (∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001, ∗∗∗P < 0.001, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗P < 0.05, N.S., not significant).
    Gene Exp Cd163 Mm00474091 M1, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 88/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/gene exp cd163 mm00474091 m1/product/Thermo Fisher
    Average 88 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    gene exp cd163 mm00474091 m1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    88/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Miltenyi Biotec cd163
    Evaluation of immune inflammation (RAW264.7) in the scaffolds. A, B) Immunofluorescent staining results and quantitative fluorescence intensity of CD206 in RAW264.7 cells co-cultured with different sample extracts, with CD206 (M2 marker) shown in red (scale bar = 50 μm). C, D) Immunofluorescent staining results and quantitative fluorescence intensity of CD86 in RAW264.7 cells co-cultured with different sample extracts, with CD86 (M1 marker) shown in green (scale bar = 50 μm). E, F) Immunofluorescent staining results and quantitative fluorescence intensity of <t>CD163</t> in RAW264.7 cells co-cultured with different sample extracts, with CD163 (M2 marker) shown in green (scale bar = 50 μm). G) Flow cytometry analysis of CD86 and CD11b positive cells in inflammatory RAW264.7 cells. H) Fluorescence enzyme labeling for the quantitative analysis of ROS content in macrophages. I) Cell viability of RAW264.7 cells co-cultured with different sample extracts for 1, 3, and 5 days. J) NO content in RAW264.7 cells co-cultured with different sample extracts. K) DCFH-DA fluorescent probe detection to evaluate ROS content in macrophages after stimulation with different sample extracts (scale bar = 100 μm). P values were determined using one-way ANOVA (∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001, ∗∗∗P < 0.001, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗P < 0.05, N.S., not significant).
    Cd163, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/cd163/product/Miltenyi Biotec
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    cd163 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    Miltenyi Biotec anti human cd163
    Evaluation of immune inflammation (RAW264.7) in the scaffolds. A, B) Immunofluorescent staining results and quantitative fluorescence intensity of CD206 in RAW264.7 cells co-cultured with different sample extracts, with CD206 (M2 marker) shown in red (scale bar = 50 μm). C, D) Immunofluorescent staining results and quantitative fluorescence intensity of CD86 in RAW264.7 cells co-cultured with different sample extracts, with CD86 (M1 marker) shown in green (scale bar = 50 μm). E, F) Immunofluorescent staining results and quantitative fluorescence intensity of <t>CD163</t> in RAW264.7 cells co-cultured with different sample extracts, with CD163 (M2 marker) shown in green (scale bar = 50 μm). G) Flow cytometry analysis of CD86 and CD11b positive cells in inflammatory RAW264.7 cells. H) Fluorescence enzyme labeling for the quantitative analysis of ROS content in macrophages. I) Cell viability of RAW264.7 cells co-cultured with different sample extracts for 1, 3, and 5 days. J) NO content in RAW264.7 cells co-cultured with different sample extracts. K) DCFH-DA fluorescent probe detection to evaluate ROS content in macrophages after stimulation with different sample extracts (scale bar = 100 μm). P values were determined using one-way ANOVA (∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001, ∗∗∗P < 0.001, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗P < 0.05, N.S., not significant).
    Anti Human Cd163, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti human cd163/product/Miltenyi Biotec
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti human cd163 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    Thermo Fisher gene exp cd163 hs00174705 m1
    A) Experimental set-up to generate DTP cells, collection of CM, and exposure to monocytes and macrophages. B) HCC827 cells expressing pLEX307-FUCCI cell cycle reporter were treated with either DMSO, 100 nM osimertinib alone, or in combination with 30 nM trametinib for 10 days. C) THP-1 cells were treated as in (B), and the expression of M2 marker genes <t>(CD163</t> and MRC1/CD206) was analyzed with RT-qPCR. D) CM was collected as in (B), with the addition of either short (48 h) or long (13 days) drug holidays, followed by THP-1 incubation as in (C). E) CD14⁺ monocyte chemotaxis toward CM from DMSO- or osimertinib/trametinib–treated cancer cells. Chemotaxis was measured using Incucyte live-cell imaging. Data shown as a percentage of cells migrated after 24 hours. F) RNA-sequencing of monocyte-derived macrophages treated according to (A), with M1 and M2 gene set expression scored relative to expression of all genes. G) GSEA of REACTOME pathways in monocyte-derived macrophages treated as in (F). H) Relative expression of genes driving the enrichment of binding and uptake of ligands by scavenger receptors -gene set (G). I) Flow cytometry analysis of cell surface expression of <t>CD163</t> in monocytes and monocyte-derived macrophages (J) exposed to DTP CM. DTP = drug-tolerant persister cells, achieved with osimertinib/trametinib treatment for 12 days, CM = conditioned medium, GSEA = gene set enrichment analysis. Data shown as mean ± SD in C and D. One-way ANOVA (C, D) or paired t-test (E, F, I, J) was used to assess statistical significance. ***, P-value <0.001; **, P-value <0.01; *, P-value < 0.05
    Gene Exp Cd163 Hs00174705 M1, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/gene exp cd163 hs00174705 m1/product/Thermo Fisher
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    gene exp cd163 hs00174705 m1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Evaluation of immune inflammation (RAW264.7) in the scaffolds. A, B) Immunofluorescent staining results and quantitative fluorescence intensity of CD206 in RAW264.7 cells co-cultured with different sample extracts, with CD206 (M2 marker) shown in red (scale bar = 50 μm). C, D) Immunofluorescent staining results and quantitative fluorescence intensity of CD86 in RAW264.7 cells co-cultured with different sample extracts, with CD86 (M1 marker) shown in green (scale bar = 50 μm). E, F) Immunofluorescent staining results and quantitative fluorescence intensity of CD163 in RAW264.7 cells co-cultured with different sample extracts, with CD163 (M2 marker) shown in green (scale bar = 50 μm). G) Flow cytometry analysis of CD86 and CD11b positive cells in inflammatory RAW264.7 cells. H) Fluorescence enzyme labeling for the quantitative analysis of ROS content in macrophages. I) Cell viability of RAW264.7 cells co-cultured with different sample extracts for 1, 3, and 5 days. J) NO content in RAW264.7 cells co-cultured with different sample extracts. K) DCFH-DA fluorescent probe detection to evaluate ROS content in macrophages after stimulation with different sample extracts (scale bar = 100 μm). P values were determined using one-way ANOVA (∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001, ∗∗∗P < 0.001, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗P < 0.05, N.S., not significant).

    Journal: Bioactive Materials

    Article Title: Immune regulative GelMA&Zn 2+ /Ce 3+ -whitlockite scaffolds with continuous ions release for bone regeneration

    doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2025.11.009

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Evaluation of immune inflammation (RAW264.7) in the scaffolds. A, B) Immunofluorescent staining results and quantitative fluorescence intensity of CD206 in RAW264.7 cells co-cultured with different sample extracts, with CD206 (M2 marker) shown in red (scale bar = 50 μm). C, D) Immunofluorescent staining results and quantitative fluorescence intensity of CD86 in RAW264.7 cells co-cultured with different sample extracts, with CD86 (M1 marker) shown in green (scale bar = 50 μm). E, F) Immunofluorescent staining results and quantitative fluorescence intensity of CD163 in RAW264.7 cells co-cultured with different sample extracts, with CD163 (M2 marker) shown in green (scale bar = 50 μm). G) Flow cytometry analysis of CD86 and CD11b positive cells in inflammatory RAW264.7 cells. H) Fluorescence enzyme labeling for the quantitative analysis of ROS content in macrophages. I) Cell viability of RAW264.7 cells co-cultured with different sample extracts for 1, 3, and 5 days. J) NO content in RAW264.7 cells co-cultured with different sample extracts. K) DCFH-DA fluorescent probe detection to evaluate ROS content in macrophages after stimulation with different sample extracts (scale bar = 100 μm). P values were determined using one-way ANOVA (∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001, ∗∗∗P < 0.001, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗P < 0.05, N.S., not significant).

    Article Snippet: Following stimulation, the cells were blocked with 5 % bovine serum albumin (BSA) for 2 h at room temperature, washed three times with PBS, and incubated overnight at 4 °C with a CD86 polyclonal antibody (1:600, 13395-1-AP, Proteintech, USA) and CD163 polyclonal antibody (1:600, 16646-1-AP, Proteintech, USA).

    Techniques: Staining, Fluorescence, Cell Culture, Marker, Flow Cytometry, Labeling

    Evaluation of immune inflammation (BMDM) in the scaffolds. A, B) Immunofluorescent staining results and quantitative fluorescence intensity of CD86 in BMDM cells co-cultured with different sample extracts, with CD86 (M1 marker) shown in green (scale bar = 50 μm). C, D) Immunofluorescent staining results and quantitative fluorescence intensity of CD163 in BMDM cells co-cultured with different sample extracts, with CD163 (M2 marker) shown in green (scale bar = 50 μm). P values were determined using one-way ANOVA (∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001, ∗∗∗P < 0.001, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗P < 0.05, N.S., not significant).

    Journal: Bioactive Materials

    Article Title: Immune regulative GelMA&Zn 2+ /Ce 3+ -whitlockite scaffolds with continuous ions release for bone regeneration

    doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2025.11.009

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Evaluation of immune inflammation (BMDM) in the scaffolds. A, B) Immunofluorescent staining results and quantitative fluorescence intensity of CD86 in BMDM cells co-cultured with different sample extracts, with CD86 (M1 marker) shown in green (scale bar = 50 μm). C, D) Immunofluorescent staining results and quantitative fluorescence intensity of CD163 in BMDM cells co-cultured with different sample extracts, with CD163 (M2 marker) shown in green (scale bar = 50 μm). P values were determined using one-way ANOVA (∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001, ∗∗∗P < 0.001, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗P < 0.05, N.S., not significant).

    Article Snippet: Following stimulation, the cells were blocked with 5 % bovine serum albumin (BSA) for 2 h at room temperature, washed three times with PBS, and incubated overnight at 4 °C with a CD86 polyclonal antibody (1:600, 13395-1-AP, Proteintech, USA) and CD163 polyclonal antibody (1:600, 16646-1-AP, Proteintech, USA).

    Techniques: Staining, Fluorescence, Cell Culture, Marker

    A) Experimental set-up to generate DTP cells, collection of CM, and exposure to monocytes and macrophages. B) HCC827 cells expressing pLEX307-FUCCI cell cycle reporter were treated with either DMSO, 100 nM osimertinib alone, or in combination with 30 nM trametinib for 10 days. C) THP-1 cells were treated as in (B), and the expression of M2 marker genes (CD163 and MRC1/CD206) was analyzed with RT-qPCR. D) CM was collected as in (B), with the addition of either short (48 h) or long (13 days) drug holidays, followed by THP-1 incubation as in (C). E) CD14⁺ monocyte chemotaxis toward CM from DMSO- or osimertinib/trametinib–treated cancer cells. Chemotaxis was measured using Incucyte live-cell imaging. Data shown as a percentage of cells migrated after 24 hours. F) RNA-sequencing of monocyte-derived macrophages treated according to (A), with M1 and M2 gene set expression scored relative to expression of all genes. G) GSEA of REACTOME pathways in monocyte-derived macrophages treated as in (F). H) Relative expression of genes driving the enrichment of binding and uptake of ligands by scavenger receptors -gene set (G). I) Flow cytometry analysis of cell surface expression of CD163 in monocytes and monocyte-derived macrophages (J) exposed to DTP CM. DTP = drug-tolerant persister cells, achieved with osimertinib/trametinib treatment for 12 days, CM = conditioned medium, GSEA = gene set enrichment analysis. Data shown as mean ± SD in C and D. One-way ANOVA (C, D) or paired t-test (E, F, I, J) was used to assess statistical significance. ***, P-value <0.001; **, P-value <0.01; *, P-value < 0.05

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: YAP/TEAD drives treatment-induced adaptive immunosuppression in EGFR-mutant lung cancer

    doi: 10.64898/2026.01.22.701073

    Figure Lengend Snippet: A) Experimental set-up to generate DTP cells, collection of CM, and exposure to monocytes and macrophages. B) HCC827 cells expressing pLEX307-FUCCI cell cycle reporter were treated with either DMSO, 100 nM osimertinib alone, or in combination with 30 nM trametinib for 10 days. C) THP-1 cells were treated as in (B), and the expression of M2 marker genes (CD163 and MRC1/CD206) was analyzed with RT-qPCR. D) CM was collected as in (B), with the addition of either short (48 h) or long (13 days) drug holidays, followed by THP-1 incubation as in (C). E) CD14⁺ monocyte chemotaxis toward CM from DMSO- or osimertinib/trametinib–treated cancer cells. Chemotaxis was measured using Incucyte live-cell imaging. Data shown as a percentage of cells migrated after 24 hours. F) RNA-sequencing of monocyte-derived macrophages treated according to (A), with M1 and M2 gene set expression scored relative to expression of all genes. G) GSEA of REACTOME pathways in monocyte-derived macrophages treated as in (F). H) Relative expression of genes driving the enrichment of binding and uptake of ligands by scavenger receptors -gene set (G). I) Flow cytometry analysis of cell surface expression of CD163 in monocytes and monocyte-derived macrophages (J) exposed to DTP CM. DTP = drug-tolerant persister cells, achieved with osimertinib/trametinib treatment for 12 days, CM = conditioned medium, GSEA = gene set enrichment analysis. Data shown as mean ± SD in C and D. One-way ANOVA (C, D) or paired t-test (E, F, I, J) was used to assess statistical significance. ***, P-value <0.001; **, P-value <0.01; *, P-value < 0.05

    Article Snippet: The following reagents were used to determine gene expression levels; Taqman 2X Universal master mix (cat# 4440047), and 20X gene expression assays GAPDH (Hs02758991_g1), ACTB (Hs99999903_m1), TBP (Hs00427620_m1), MRC1/CD206 (Hs00267207_m1), and CD163 (Hs00174705_m1).

    Techniques: Expressing, Marker, Quantitative RT-PCR, Incubation, Chemotaxis Assay, Live Cell Imaging, RNA Sequencing, Derivative Assay, Binding Assay, Flow Cytometry

    A) Experimental set-up for conditioned media collection and YAP/TEAD inhibition in DTP cells. B) RNA-sequencing analysis of the expression of genes encoding for secreted proteins in HCC827 and HCC4006 cell lines treated as in (A). C) YAP-driven secretome in HCC827 and HCC4006 cells, determined by genes upregulated in DTPs, and downregulated upon TEAD inhibition. D) Shared YAP-driven secretome in HCC827 and HCC4006. E) ChIP-seq analysis of YAP binding of shared secretome genes. F) List of shared YAP-driven secretome from (D), with genes previously associated with macrophage activation, migration, or polarization highlighted in bold. G) CD163 expression of THP-1 cells treated with HCC827 conditioned media collected as in (A) using 500 nM ORM-47286 or 10 mM MYF-01-37 for TEAD inhibition. H) Flow cytometry analysis of CD163 and TREM2 cell surface expression in human peripheral blood monocytes exposed to HCC827 conditioned media. Data in (G) presented as mean ± SD. Unpaired (G) and paired (H) one-way ANOVA was used to assess statistical significance. **, P-value <0.01; *, P-value < 0.05.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: YAP/TEAD drives treatment-induced adaptive immunosuppression in EGFR-mutant lung cancer

    doi: 10.64898/2026.01.22.701073

    Figure Lengend Snippet: A) Experimental set-up for conditioned media collection and YAP/TEAD inhibition in DTP cells. B) RNA-sequencing analysis of the expression of genes encoding for secreted proteins in HCC827 and HCC4006 cell lines treated as in (A). C) YAP-driven secretome in HCC827 and HCC4006 cells, determined by genes upregulated in DTPs, and downregulated upon TEAD inhibition. D) Shared YAP-driven secretome in HCC827 and HCC4006. E) ChIP-seq analysis of YAP binding of shared secretome genes. F) List of shared YAP-driven secretome from (D), with genes previously associated with macrophage activation, migration, or polarization highlighted in bold. G) CD163 expression of THP-1 cells treated with HCC827 conditioned media collected as in (A) using 500 nM ORM-47286 or 10 mM MYF-01-37 for TEAD inhibition. H) Flow cytometry analysis of CD163 and TREM2 cell surface expression in human peripheral blood monocytes exposed to HCC827 conditioned media. Data in (G) presented as mean ± SD. Unpaired (G) and paired (H) one-way ANOVA was used to assess statistical significance. **, P-value <0.01; *, P-value < 0.05.

    Article Snippet: The following reagents were used to determine gene expression levels; Taqman 2X Universal master mix (cat# 4440047), and 20X gene expression assays GAPDH (Hs02758991_g1), ACTB (Hs99999903_m1), TBP (Hs00427620_m1), MRC1/CD206 (Hs00267207_m1), and CD163 (Hs00174705_m1).

    Techniques: Inhibition, RNA Sequencing, Expressing, ChIP-sequencing, Binding Assay, Activation Assay, Migration, Flow Cytometry